Disclaimer

By clicking, "I Accept" below, you accept and acknowledge the following:

The purpose of this website is to provide general information and insights about TLH, Advocates & Solicitors, and not to advertise or solicit work in any manner whatsoever.

Please note that as per the Bar Council of India Rules, advocates in India are prohibited from advertising or soliciting work in any form or manner. You acknowledge that you are visiting this website at your discretion and that there has been no solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its professionals in relation to this website.

The content available on this website does not constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be substituted for advice relevant to particular circumstances.

The access and use of this website does not establish any fiduciary or other relationship between you and TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its advocates.

Please read the ‘Terms of Use’ and our ‘Privacy Policy’ before accessing this website.

Blog default background
Blog
Real Estate

The Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973: Exemptions in Acquiring Agricultural Land

Authors:
Rohit Sharma
February 16, 2025
5 min read
Share this post
Copied!

The Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (“TS Act”), was a legislative measure aimed at limiting the maximum amount of agricultural land that could be owned by an individual or family in the state of Telangana. It was a significant step aimed at promoting equitable land distribution in the State. The TS Act’s primary objectives were to mitigate the concentration of land ownership, address inequalities in the agricultural sector, and ensure that small farmers and the landless had access to land [1] . This blog explores the legal framework of the TS Act, particularly its provisions regarding land ceiling exemptions.

Overview of the TS Act

At its core, the TS Act seeks to limit the amount of agricultural land that individuals, families, and entities can own. By establishing a ceiling, based on the productivity and type of land, the legislation aimed to dismantle large landholdings—often acquired through inheritance or other means—and facilitate redistribution to smallholders and the landless. The ceilings were determined according to national guidelines, which outlined specific limits: 10-18 acres for the highest quality land, 18–27 acres for second-class land, and 27–54 acres for other land types, with larger allowances for hilly or desert areas.

Industrial Purposes

Section 23(h) permits businesses engaged in industrial development to acquire land beyond the ceiling limits. This exemption recognizes the role of industrialization in driving economic growth. Companies may apply for additional land if it is deemed necessary for establishing factories or processing plants. However, this process is subject to rigorous government scrutiny to ensure that the land is utilized appropriately and for the intended industrial purposes.

Public Purposes

The TS Act defines "public purpose" broadly, encompassing projects that contribute to societal welfare, such as hospitals, educational institutions, and essential infrastructure like roads and bridges. Entities seeking land for these purposes can apply for exemptions, which the government assesses based on the project’s public benefit. This provision reflects the state’s commitment to fostering social and economic development while addressing immediate public needs.

Agricultural Research and Development

Organizations involved in agricultural research and development are also eligible for exemptions under Section 23. This includes businesses, academic institutions, and research organizations engaged in activities aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity. By allowing these entities to exceed landholding limits, the TS Act promotes advancements in agricultural science, benefiting the farming community and contributing to food security.

Plantations

Plantations cultivating high-value cash crops such as tea, coffee, and rubber can apply for exemptions as well under Section 23(d). These plantations are considered vital for the state’s economic development due to their potential for export and employment generation. The government grants exemptions to ensure that such agricultural enterprises contribute meaningfully to local economies and national revenue.

Cooperative Farming Societies

Cooperative farming societies, often formed by small and marginal farmers, are also granted exemptions under specific circumstances. These cooperatives may require additional land to implement modern farming techniques and achieve economies of scale. By enabling these groups to exceed land ceilings as given under Section 23(e)(i), the government supports the broader goals of empowering small farmers and reducing rural economic disparities.

State or Central Government Projects

Land acquisitions for projects initiated by state or central governments typically do not fall under the land ceiling restrictions as given under Section 23(a). These projects may include urban development, infrastructure improvements, and public utilities. Businesses partnering in such government initiatives may also be permitted to acquire land beyond the limits, provided the acquisition is directly related to an approved project. This exemption underscores the need for effective infrastructure development to benefit the public.

Government Approval and Conditions for Exemptions

While Section 23 provides a framework for exemptions, the approval process is stringent. Organizations seeking additional land must demonstrate that it is necessary for their proposed use. The government has the authority to impose conditions, such as timelines for land utilization and provisions for reclaiming land if it is not used as intended. These safeguards help prevent misuse of the exemptions and ensure that land serves its intended purpose.

In Executive Officer, Sri M.S.N. Charities, Kakinada v. Pilla Ramarao and Others (2000) [2] , the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh examined the validity of a landlord's attempt to resume tenancy under the A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (“AP Act”) and the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956 (“Tenancy Act”). The Court noted that, under Section 23 of the AP Act, temple lands are exempt from its provisions. However, the Court clarified
that while temple lands are exempt from the AP Act, Section 12 of the Tenancy Act limits landlords to resuming only up to half of the tenanted land, provided they do not exceed two-thirds of the ceiling limit through self-cultivation. The resumption process can only be initiated once and must be in good faith for self-cultivation purposes. Additionally, procedural irregularities, such as non-compliance with Rule 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Rules, 1980, may be addressed through substantial compliance. The burden of proof lies with the tenant to establish exceptions to the landlord's resumption claim. 

Conclusion

The Act, represents a progressive effort to address land inequality and promote social justice in the agricultural sector. Through Section 23, the Act provides a balanced approach allowing for exemptions in land ceiling. However, the continued evaluation and effective implementation of this legislation are crucial for achieving its intended outcomes and promoting sustainable development in Telangana.

References:

[1] Samridhi Jain, ‘Land Reforms Act in Telangana: Is Owning Land Enough? | IDR’ (India Development Review2 February 2021) https://idronline.org/ground-up-stories/land-reforms-act-telangana-is-owning-land-enough ; accessed 16 January 2025.
[2] Executive Officer, Sri M.S.N. Charities, Kakinada v. Pilla Ramarao and Others 2000 SCC OnLine AP 270.

No items found.
tatva legal, tatva, tatva legal blog, legal blogs india, tatva legal law firm, law firms of india, law firm telangana, law services hyderabad, law firm hyderabad

Footnotes

Share this post
Copied!

Latest posts

Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
The Finfluencer Effect: Unravelling Market Manipulation
Recently, the Indian stock market regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) published a discussion paper addressing the growing concern pertaining to financial influencers, or finfluencers, providing financial advice. These influencers often lack the requisite qualifications and accountability for their recommendations.
Read more
Arrow Right
Employment Law
June 14, 2025
Contract Labour Deployment in India - Demystifying the Future Conceived by the Code on Occupational Safety, Health & Working Conditions, 2020
The business of human resource deployment by contractors for their clients has grown and evolved globally. In India, the contractor-sourced industrial workforce grew by about 293% between 2002-03 and 2021-22.[1] Recently, India has unfurled four labour codes that revamp its existing labour laws to meet the needs of the Indian workforce such as contract labour deployment.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
Exploring Unchartered Territory? Laws for the Void
What can the Indian space sector learn from the Avengers? Besides, the incredible budget and scale, the key takeaway would be - bringing experts together to achieve phenomenal results. We all remember the fascinating back stories, the strength of and the role each member plays to fill an essential need under the able guidance of a strong leader.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
The 100% FDI Debate: Insurance for All or a Market for Few?
While the Union Budget for Financial Year 2025-26 (���2025 Budget�۝) was successful in drawing attention of the whole nation through the personal tax exemption on incomes up to ��_12 lakh under the new tax regime [1], a critical announcement pertaining to the insurance sector was eclipsed. The 2025 Budget also introduced a key reform to reshape the ownership structure of the Indian insurance industry.
Read more
Arrow Right
Dispute Resolution
June 14, 2025
Right to Speedy Trial and its Application in Cases Involving Economic Offences
This article examines the judicial precedents that paved the way in recognising and upholding the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental right and the recent developments in cases involving economic offences in India wherein bails were granted to accused persons on the ground of the right to a speedy trial.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 12, 2025
Liability Shift: The Impact of RBI’s Directive on PE/VC Appointed Observers in the Board of NBFCs
The article explores the regulatory implications of RBI's recent directive and its potential impact on private equity and venture capital-appointed board observers in NBFCs — a timely and significant development for the financial sector.
Read more
Arrow Right
View All Blogs
Arrow Right