Disclaimer

By clicking, "I Accept" below, you accept and acknowledge the following:

The purpose of this website is to provide general information and insights about TLH, Advocates & Solicitors, and not to advertise or solicit work in any manner whatsoever.

Please note that as per the Bar Council of India Rules, advocates in India are prohibited from advertising or soliciting work in any form or manner. You acknowledge that you are visiting this website at your discretion and that there has been no solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its professionals in relation to this website.

The content available on this website does not constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be substituted for advice relevant to particular circumstances.

The access and use of this website does not establish any fiduciary or other relationship between you and TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its advocates.

Please read the ‘Terms of Use’ and our ‘Privacy Policy’ before accessing this website.

Blog default background
Blog
Real Estate

���QUIET TITLE�۪ vis-��-vis INDIA

Authors:
Ashish Anshu
January 31, 2020
5 min read
Share this post
Copied!

What is ‘Quiet Title’:

Title is the right of ownership and possession of a particular property. So, to ‘quiet title’ means to take action in order to establish a person’s title to a property, against anyone and everyone, and thus ‘quiet’ any challenge or claim to title to a property.

Purpose of a ‘Quiet Title’ action:

The purpose of a ‘quiet title’ action is to establish title of the property and to determine who actually has legal interest in the property. In a ‘quiet title’ action, a court proceeding removes a cloud or possible encumbrance on title to a property to firmly establish, in law, ownership of the property.

Grounds for a ‘Quiet Title’ action:

It comprises a plaint that the title of a property is defective and ambiguous, on the grounds stated in the plaint. Typical grounds include:

*          adverse possession, where the new possessor sues to obtain title in his or her own name; *          fraudulent conveyance of a property, perhaps by a forged deed or under coercion;

*          tax issues, where a municipality claims title in lieu of taxes owed;

*          boundary disputes between state, municipality, or private parties;

*          surveying errors; and

*          competing claims by missing heirs and lien holders.

Process to initiate ‘Quiet Title’ action:

To initiate an action to ‘quiet title’, the property owner must file a plaint before the jurisdictional civil Court inter alia performing the following:

*          Identify the full description of the property to be quieted;

*          Name anyone who might have interest in the described property as a defendant to the suit; and

*          Give notice to all potentially interested parties. If the Court finds that the party seeking to ‘quiet title’ actually owns title, the Court will grant a quiet title judgment / decree, which provides that the party has legal and good title.

Goal of a ‘Quiet Title’ action:

The goal of a ‘quiet title’ action is to establish free and clear ownership of the property, and to resolve any defects found in a property.  Depending on the circumstances, the process and outcomes can change.

Indian Courts on ‘Quiet Title’:

The Supreme Court of India in the case of

Razia Begum v. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum & Others

[1] while dealing with the issue of declaratory suit and declaratory relief vis-à-vis the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 observed as follows: “

In this connection, it has to be remarked that the discretion vested in a court to grant a merely declaratory relief as distinguished from a judgment which is capable of being enforced by execution, derives its utility and importance from the objects it has in view, namely, to “prevent future litigation by removing existing causes of controversy”, “to quiet title” and “to perpetuate testimony”, as also to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This practice of granting declaratory reliefs, which originated in England in the Equity Courts, has been very much extended in America by statutory provisions. In India, the law has been codified in the Specific Relief Act, in Chapter VI, and has, in a sense, extended the scope of the rule by providing for declarations not only in respect of claims to property but also in respect of disputes as regards status. From the terms of Section 42 of the Act, it would appear that the Indian courts have not been empowered to grant every form of declaration which may be available in America. In its very nature, a declaratory decree does not confer any new right, but only clears up mists which may have gathered round the title to property or to status or a legal character. When a court makes a declaration in respect of a disputed status, important rights flow from such a judicial declaration. Hence, a declaration granted in respect of a legal character or status in favour of a person is meant to bind not only persons actually parties to the litigation, but also persons claiming though them, as laid down in Section 43 of the Act. It is, thus, a rule of substantive law, and is distinct and separate from the rule of res judicata or estoppel by judgment.”

The Calcutta High Court in the case of Tarak Nath Roy Chowdhury and Another v. Syama Charan Chowdhury and Another[2] observed that “the object of a declaratory decree is to quiet title, and the Court should not make such a decree when it would not be conclusive”.

The Calcutta High Court in the case of Kalpana Majumdar v. Packard Exports Private Limited[3] observed that “It is obvious that the declaration would not bind persons who are not parties to the suit, Section 35 of the Specific Relief Act enacts a rule of substantive law. Such declaratory relief has great importance viewed from its objectivity that the effect of such declaration is to prevent future litigation by removing existing causes of controversy, to quiet title, and to perpetuate testimony, as also to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. In a case where a Court makes a declaration in respect of a disputed status, important rights flow from such a judicial declaration, not only binds persons who are actually parties to the litigation but also persons claiming through them. It is, thus, a rule of substantive law and is distinct and separate from the rule of res judicata, it is narrower in one sense and wider in another. The doctrine of res judicata lays particular stress upon the competence of the Court, but this section emphasizes the legal position that it is a judgment in personem, as distinguished from a judgment in rem.”

Conclusion:

 In view of the above, a ‘quiet title’ action / proceeding removes cloud or possible encumbrance on title to a property and firmly establishes, in law, ownership of the property. The Indian Courts have decided in a catena of cases that viewed from its objectivity, such declaratory relief has great importance. The effect of such declaration is to prevent future litigation by removing existing causes of controversy, to quiet title, and to perpetuate testimony, as also to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The views and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author and do not reflect the position of Tatva Legal Hyderabad.

[1] 1958 AIR SC 886

[2] MANU/WB/0388/1916

[3] MANU/WB/1075/2013

No items found.
quiet title, real estate, title

Footnotes

Share this post
Copied!

Latest posts

July 10, 2025
From PSUs To Private Companies: Enforceability of Employment Bonds in India
This article explores the enforceability of employment bonds in India, focusing on their legal standing, key court decisions, and what makes such agreements valid or void in both public and private sectors.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
July 9, 2025
SEBI’s New Disclosure Norms for Related Party Transactions: Redefining Corporate Governance in Listed Companies
The article revolves around corporate governance reforms introduced by SEBI related to Related Party Transactions (RPTs).
Read more
Arrow Right
Dispute Resolution
July 8, 2025
Revisiting the IBC-RERA Interplay in light of Umang Realtech
The article examines the evolving jurisprudence around the interface of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), with particular focus on the recent Umang Realtech decision.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
The Finfluencer Effect: Unravelling Market Manipulation
Recently, the Indian stock market regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) published a discussion paper addressing the growing concern pertaining to financial influencers, or finfluencers, providing financial advice. These influencers often lack the requisite qualifications and accountability for their recommendations.
Read more
Arrow Right
Employment Law
June 14, 2025
Contract Labour Deployment in India - Demystifying the Future Conceived by the Code on Occupational Safety, Health & Working Conditions, 2020
The business of human resource deployment by contractors for their clients has grown and evolved globally. In India, the contractor-sourced industrial workforce grew by about 293% between 2002-03 and 2021-22.[1] Recently, India has unfurled four labour codes that revamp its existing labour laws to meet the needs of the Indian workforce such as contract labour deployment.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
Exploring Unchartered Territory? Laws for the Void
What can the Indian space sector learn from the Avengers? Besides, the incredible budget and scale, the key takeaway would be - bringing experts together to achieve phenomenal results. We all remember the fascinating back stories, the strength of and the role each member plays to fill an essential need under the able guidance of a strong leader.
Read more
Arrow Right
View All Blogs
Arrow Right