Disclaimer

By clicking, "I Accept" below, you accept and acknowledge the following:

The purpose of this website is to provide general information and insights about TLH, Advocates & Solicitors, and not to advertise or solicit work in any manner whatsoever.

Please note that as per the Bar Council of India Rules, advocates in India are prohibited from advertising or soliciting work in any form or manner. You acknowledge that you are visiting this website at your discretion and that there has been no solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its professionals in relation to this website.

The content available on this website does not constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be substituted for advice relevant to particular circumstances.

The access and use of this website does not establish any fiduciary or other relationship between you and TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its advocates.

Please read the ‘Terms of Use’ and our ‘Privacy Policy’ before accessing this website.

Blog default background
Blog
Corporate Law

Liability of Directors for Actions of Company in India

Authors:
Mythri Jonnala
February 14, 2020
5 min read
Share this post
Copied!

1. Introduction

The Union Budget 2020-2021 proposes to decriminalise offences specified under the Companies Act, 2013, which may significantly impact the liability of directors for actions of companies in India. In view of the amendments proposed, this article aims to examine the circumstances in which presently, the directors of a company can be held liable for actions of the company.

2. Legislative Framework

This article examines the following frameworks for determining director liability in India for the actions of the company: (a) Companies Act, 2013; (b) Indian Penal Code, 1860; and (c) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

3. Companies Act, 2013

3.1 Key Terms under the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”)

Section 2 (34) of the Act defines “director” as a director appointed to the Board of a company; Section 2 (59) of the Act defines “officer” as any director, manager or key managerial personnel or any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the Board of Directors or the directors are accustomed to act; Section 2 (60) of the Act defines “officer who is in default” as inter alia an officer of the company namely:

  • whole-time director;
  • key managerial personnel or such director(s) specified by the Board in this behalf and who has given his in writing to the Board to such specification, or all the directors, if no director is so specified;
  • any person who, under the immediate authority of the Board or any key managerial personnel, is charged with any responsibility and authorises, actively participates in, knowingly permits, or knowingly fails to take active steps to prevent, any default;
  • any person in accordance with whose advice, directions or instructions the Board of Directors of the company is accustomed to act, other than a person providing advice in a professional capacity; and
  • every director, who is aware of such contravention, or where such contravention had taken place with his consent or connivance.

3.2 Company Liability and Director Liability under the Act

A company is a distinct and independent entity and thus, the liability of a company will be different from the liability of a director in such company. However, under the Act, liability for default by a company will be imposed on the officer who is in default, and such officer shall be liable for penalty, imprisonment, fine or otherwise. This includes:

  • An offense and / or contravention was committed with a director’s consent and / or connivance;
  • Every director who is aware of a contravention by virtue of participation in proceedings with respect to such contravention, and does not object to the same; or
  • A director whose negligence resulted in the offense.

However, in Tristar Consultants v M/S Vcustomer Services India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr the Delhi High Court[1] stated that even though a company is a juristic person, it has to act through a living human being. The decisions on behalf of a company are taken by its board of directors and an individual director cannot act on behalf of the company unless such power is conferred upon him either through a specific board resolution or through the articles of association of the company. While directors have a fiduciary relationship with the company and act as agents of the company, the directors owe no fiduciary or contractual duties or any duty of care to third parties who deal with the company. The Hon’ble Court held that the liability of a director arises only if they derive any personal benefit while purporting to act on behalf of the company.

Similarly, in Hubtown Limited vs IDBI Trusteeship Service Limited, one of the contentions made before the Bombay High Court[2] was that the two subsidiaries of a parent company should be viewed as a single entity. However, the Bombay High Court held that, “the aforesaid contention is preposterous to say the lease, as the sequitur thereto, would be that all subsidiaries are the same entity as their respective parent”. The Bombay High Court inter alia held that the parent and its subsidiaries cannot be said to be the same entity.

4. Indian Penal Code, 1860

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 provides for offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating under Sections 405 and 415 respectively, pursuant to which a director may face criminal liability for actions of the company. However, in GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust vs. India Infoline Limited[3], the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India upheld the judgement passed by the Delhi High Court which had quashed the summons on the grounds that vicarious liability of the managing director and other directors of the company cannot be alleged and the complainant needs to specifically allege the act/complaint of/against the individual director and what role such individual director had played.

5. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

In 2010, in the case National Small Industries Corp. Ltd. vs. Harmeet Singh Paintal and Ors[4] before the Supreme Court of India, a director was accused of offences under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Supreme Court held that for holding directors liable for offences committed by the company under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, there must be specific averments against the directors, showing as to how and in what manner the directors were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company.

The Supreme Court further held that a company, though a legal entity, can act only through its Board of Directors. The settled position is that a managing director is prima facie in-charge of and responsible for the company's business and affairs and can be prosecuted for offences by the company. But insofar as other directors are concerned, they can be prosecuted only if they were in-charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company.

6. Conclusion

To conclude, the liability of a company is separate and independent from the liability of its director. For a claim of liability to arise against the directors of a company, vicarious liability of directors cannot be alleged, and specific allegations have to be made and evidenced against the directors of a company. With anticipated implementation of the amendments to Companies Act, 2013 decriminalising offences, there may be changes in the way a director’s liability for the actions of a company is ascertained.

The views and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author and do not reflect the position of Tatva Legal Hyderabad.

[1] C.R.P. No. 365/2006

[2] Summons for Judgment No. 39 of 2013 in Summary Suit No. 520 of 2013

[3] Criminal Appeal No. 488 of 2013.

[4] Criminal Appeal Nos. 320-336 of 2010 and Criminal Appeal No. 337 of 2010.  

No items found.
Companies Act, Corporate, Director Liability, Indian Penal Code, Negotiable Instruments Act, Vicarious Liability

Footnotes

Share this post
Copied!

Latest posts

July 10, 2025
From PSUs To Private Companies: Enforceability of Employment Bonds in India
This article explores the enforceability of employment bonds in India, focusing on their legal standing, key court decisions, and what makes such agreements valid or void in both public and private sectors.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
July 9, 2025
SEBI’s New Disclosure Norms for Related Party Transactions: Redefining Corporate Governance in Listed Companies
The article revolves around corporate governance reforms introduced by SEBI related to Related Party Transactions (RPTs).
Read more
Arrow Right
Dispute Resolution
July 8, 2025
Revisiting the IBC-RERA Interplay in light of Umang Realtech
The article examines the evolving jurisprudence around the interface of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), with particular focus on the recent Umang Realtech decision.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
The Finfluencer Effect: Unravelling Market Manipulation
Recently, the Indian stock market regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) published a discussion paper addressing the growing concern pertaining to financial influencers, or finfluencers, providing financial advice. These influencers often lack the requisite qualifications and accountability for their recommendations.
Read more
Arrow Right
Employment Law
June 14, 2025
Contract Labour Deployment in India - Demystifying the Future Conceived by the Code on Occupational Safety, Health & Working Conditions, 2020
The business of human resource deployment by contractors for their clients has grown and evolved globally. In India, the contractor-sourced industrial workforce grew by about 293% between 2002-03 and 2021-22.[1] Recently, India has unfurled four labour codes that revamp its existing labour laws to meet the needs of the Indian workforce such as contract labour deployment.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
Exploring Unchartered Territory? Laws for the Void
What can the Indian space sector learn from the Avengers? Besides, the incredible budget and scale, the key takeaway would be - bringing experts together to achieve phenomenal results. We all remember the fascinating back stories, the strength of and the role each member plays to fill an essential need under the able guidance of a strong leader.
Read more
Arrow Right
View All Blogs
Arrow Right