Disclaimer

By clicking, "I Accept" below, you accept and acknowledge the following:

The purpose of this website is to provide general information and insights about TLH, Advocates & Solicitors, and not to advertise or solicit work in any manner whatsoever.

Please note that as per the Bar Council of India Rules, advocates in India are prohibited from advertising or soliciting work in any form or manner. You acknowledge that you are visiting this website at your discretion and that there has been no solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its professionals in relation to this website.

The content available on this website does not constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be substituted for advice relevant to particular circumstances.

The access and use of this website does not establish any fiduciary or other relationship between you and TLH, Advocates & Solicitors or any of its advocates.

Please read the ‘Terms of Use’ and our ‘Privacy Policy’ before accessing this website.

Blog default background
Blog
Real Estate

INAM LANDS IN TELANGANA : RIGHTS OF INAMDARS AND PURCHASERS

Authors:
Jyothirmayee MN
April 6, 2020
5 min read
Share this post
Copied!

This article discusses the abolition of Inam lands in Telangana and examines the procedure laid under Telangana legislation for grant of occupancy right certificates to Inamdars, the occupants of Inam lands and any subsequent purchaser of Inam lands in Telangana.

Inam Defined

The word Inam means ‘gift’. As per the provisions of the Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955[1] (“Act”), ‘Inam’ is defined as land:

  • held under a gift or a grant made by the Nizam or other competent grantor;
  • continued or confirmed by virtue of a muntakab or other title deed;
  • with or without the condition of service;
  • coupled with the remission of the whole or part of the land revenue thereon; and
  • recorded in the revenue records, accordingly.

The person holding such Inam is known as ‘Inamdar’ and includes the successor-in-interest of an Inamdar.

Abolition of Inam

With effect from July 20, 1955, all ‘Inams’ were abolished and the pre-existing rights, title and interests of the Inamdar or any person having occupation of the Inam land were divested and vested in the Government, until a re-grant (by issuance of an Occupancy Right Certificate (“ORC”)) was made in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

In the State of Telangana, the Telangana Abolition of Inams Rules, 1975 (“Rules”) declared November 1, 1973 as the cut-off date for determining Inamdar / occupants in possession of Inam land, who were entitled to re-grant by issuance of ORC.

Procedure for obtaining ORC

An application in Form-I is required to be made by the Inamdar or the occupants (viz. kabiz-e-kadim[2], permanent tenants[3], protected tenants[4], non-protected tenants), or any person on behalf of the Inamdar or the occupants, or suo-moto by the Collector / Revenue Divisional Officer[5], in respect of the Inam land, for grant of patta / ORC.

Thereafter, a notice in Form-II is issued, and upon conducting enquiry, an order is passed by the Collector determining the (a) extent of entitlement to Inam land, (b) amount of premium to be paid to the Government, and (c) extent of land to be taken over from the applicant in excess of the limits specified in the Act.

Accordingly, upon payment of the prescribed premium amount to the Government, ORC in Form-III is issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, in favour of the applicant.

After issuance of ORC to the Inamdar or occupants of the Inam land, as the case may be, necessary changes in the revenue records are made, and Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed are issued to the ORC holder.

Consequence of Abolition and its Effects on Purchaser of Inam Land

Upon promulgation of the Act and pursuant to all Inam land vesting free of encumbrances in the Government, one of the major ambiguities that arose was whether apart from Inamdar / occupant in possession of Inam land as on November 1, 1973, the purchaser of Inam land from the Inamdar was also entitled to issuance of ORC or not. As the Act and the Rules do not provide a clear position, judicial interpretation is sought in this regard. The Courts in the following cases have examined this issue:

  • In the case of Chama Narasimha Reddy and Another Versus Joint Collector and Others[6] the Andhra Pradesh High Court[7] held:

the Inams Act abolished Inams with effect from July 20, 1955 and the Government declared November 1, 1973 as the date of vesting for purpose of Sections 4 to 8. Therefore, though all the inams stood abolished and the land vested in the State is free from encumbrances with effect from July 20, 1955, all the persons who were in possession of the land as on November 1, 1973 are entitled for occupancy rights certificate.”

  • The Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Bhimavarapu Venkaiah vs. Revenue Divisional Officer[8] relying on the judgement passed in the case of Kodithala Keshavulu vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others[9], and S Veera Reddy and Another vs. Chellapalli Chendraiah and Others[10] observed:

This Court, both the learned single Judge and the Division Benches, dealing with the similar question whether the purchaser of the inam lands from the Inamdars covered by the Act could maintain an application for occupancy rights, opined that the purchaser of the inam land covered by the Act could also make application for grant of occupancy rights.”

Further the Court in the Bhimavarapu Venkaiah case[11] while explaining the ambit of ‘successors-in-interests’ of Inamdars, opined:

Rule 5 of the Rules clearly provides for an application being made not only by an Inamdar, but also by his successor-in-interest. The word ‘successor-in-interest’ is of wide amplitude. It need not be confined only to heirs. An interest can devolve either by succession or by private treaty or by operation of law. In all these cases, the person upon whom the interest devolves would be a successor-in-interest.”

  • In the case of S M Fazlullah Shah Quadri and Others Versus Nemali Krishna and Others[12] the High Court observed that ‘the property vested with the Government and if the Government is not obstructing the possession and enjoyment of the land by the plaintiff, then it is for the Government to take steps to do so’.
  • Again, in Madhuvath Tharya vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and others[13] the High Court, while dealing with the nature of the claims to be allowed in issuance of ORC, observed:

“‘when the father of the petitioner who was in possession of the Inam land as on November 1, 1973, executed registered sale deeds in favour of the respondents in the year 1988-1989 and gave a statement before the Revenue Divisional Officer (competent authority to issue ORC) that he has no objection for granting ORC in favour of the purchasers, the petitioner shall not have any claim as he was neither an occupant nor vendor of the lands nor declared as only legal heir by any competent civil court in respect of the subject lands.”

Conclusion

In view of the above, the provisions of the Act and the Rules provide that only Inamdar and/or occupant in possession of an Inam land (including kabiz-e-kadim, protected tenants and their successors in interest) are entitled to issuance of ORC, as a matter of right, and subject to the proof that the they were in occupation of the Inam land as on November 1, 1973. However, as held by the Courts on several occasions, not only the Inamdar / occupant in possession of an Inam land as on November 1, 1973, but even the purchaser of Inam Land from the Inamdar, depending upon the circumstances of each case, is entitled to issuance of ORC subject to fulfillment of specific conditions, if any. 

The views and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author and do not reflect the position of Tatva Legal Hyderabad.

[1]  After formation of Telangana State, and subsequent to passing of Telangana Adaptation of Laws Order, 2016, the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 and Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Rules, 1975 (previously) are now Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 and Telangana Abolition of Inams Rules, 1975

[2] Holder of inam land other than an inamdar, who has been in possession of such land at the time of the grant of inam or has been in continuous possession of such land for not less than twelve years before the date of vesting and who pays the inamdar only the land revenue.

[3] A person who, from a date prior to June 10, 1950 has been cultivating the inam land on a permanent lease from the inamdar whether under an instrument or an oral agreement.

[4] Protected tenant as defined in the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 is one who is in possession of the land for six years during 1342F-1352F or six years preceding to 1-1-1948 or six years from 1353F and possession on 10-6-1950 and that no Inamdar has made an application to declare such person is not a Protected Tenant in possession as on 10-6-1950 and the holding of the inamdar /land holder is three family holdings excluding the land concerned. [

5] GO Ms No. 1122 dated August 20, 1975

[6] 2007 (2) ALD 28

[7] The High Court for the State of Telangana (erstwhile High Court of (united) Andhra Pradesh)

[8]  1999 (4) ALD 219 (AP)

[9] 1978(2) AWR3

[10] 1995 (2) ALT 172 [

11] Supra note 11 [

12] 2015 (5) ALD 743 [

13] 2018 (6) ALD 462

No items found.
1955; Occupancy Right Certificate; Inamdar; Inam Lands,Telangana Abolition of Inams Act1955; Occupancy Right Certificate; Inamdar; Inam Lands,Telangana Abolition of Inams Act

Footnotes

Share this post
Copied!

Latest posts

Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
The Finfluencer Effect: Unravelling Market Manipulation
Recently, the Indian stock market regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) published a discussion paper addressing the growing concern pertaining to financial influencers, or finfluencers, providing financial advice. These influencers often lack the requisite qualifications and accountability for their recommendations.
Read more
Arrow Right
Employment Law
June 14, 2025
Contract Labour Deployment in India - Demystifying the Future Conceived by the Code on Occupational Safety, Health & Working Conditions, 2020
The business of human resource deployment by contractors for their clients has grown and evolved globally. In India, the contractor-sourced industrial workforce grew by about 293% between 2002-03 and 2021-22.[1] Recently, India has unfurled four labour codes that revamp its existing labour laws to meet the needs of the Indian workforce such as contract labour deployment.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
Exploring Unchartered Territory? Laws for the Void
What can the Indian space sector learn from the Avengers? Besides, the incredible budget and scale, the key takeaway would be - bringing experts together to achieve phenomenal results. We all remember the fascinating back stories, the strength of and the role each member plays to fill an essential need under the able guidance of a strong leader.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 14, 2025
The 100% FDI Debate: Insurance for All or a Market for Few?
While the Union Budget for Financial Year 2025-26 (���2025 Budget�۝) was successful in drawing attention of the whole nation through the personal tax exemption on incomes up to ��_12 lakh under the new tax regime [1], a critical announcement pertaining to the insurance sector was eclipsed. The 2025 Budget also introduced a key reform to reshape the ownership structure of the Indian insurance industry.
Read more
Arrow Right
Dispute Resolution
June 14, 2025
Right to Speedy Trial and its Application in Cases Involving Economic Offences
This article examines the judicial precedents that paved the way in recognising and upholding the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental right and the recent developments in cases involving economic offences in India wherein bails were granted to accused persons on the ground of the right to a speedy trial.
Read more
Arrow Right
Corporate Law
June 12, 2025
Liability Shift: The Impact of RBI’s Directive on PE/VC Appointed Observers in the Board of NBFCs
The article explores the regulatory implications of RBI's recent directive and its potential impact on private equity and venture capital-appointed board observers in NBFCs — a timely and significant development for the financial sector.
Read more
Arrow Right
View All Blogs
Arrow Right